The first part made me stop while reading this article was that I didn't know the misconception about math had formed long time ago. Common sense often constrains individuals when it comes to mathematics, impeding their progress in the subject. Many people perceive math as a realm of rote calculations and formula memorization, aligning with their notion of "common sense." This limited perspective acts as a barrier, discouraging them from delving into the deeper, more abstract facets of mathematics. In reality, math encompasses critical thinking, creative problem-solving, and broad applications across diverse fields. Overcoming this common sense hurdle requires a shift in perspective, recognizing math as a tool to understand the world and tackle complex problems. Cultivating a growth mindset and providing hands-on learning experiences can help individuals break free from these constraints, allowing them to appreciate the beauty and versatility of mathematics beyond its surface-level computations.
The second part made me stop was while I read this article is that during 1960s the textbook was designed schools are essential because US needs more scientific elites. These institutions cultivate creativity and critical thinking among students in fields like engineering and design. In an age where technological prowess is paramount, we must equip the next generation to drive innovation and maintain our global competitiveness, much like the need for scientific excellence during the Cold War.
The third part made me stop was: in the 1990s, America's secondary-level math ranking fell behind fast-developing nations, causing anxiety about international competitiveness and the nation's ability to prepare students for a technology-driven world. This prompted calls for educational reforms and a renewed focus on math education, not as standoff between different political view.
***Revise***
The way of math education changed so much that it made it tough for students and their parents to adjust. This shift also left parents feeling confused, as they found it difficult to help their children learn in this new educational environment. With such a strong focus on math, students felt a lot of pressure and had a hard time keeping up with the changes in the curriculum. Since teacher is empowered in classroom and students grade very lean on reports from their teacher, the qualification of teacher is very important. A math teacher's proficiency and passion for the subject significantly impact students' math learning experiences. I had many students have expressed disliking math due to previous encounters with unskilled or dispassionate teachers. A teacher's expertise and enthusiasm can make math more engaging, accessible, and enjoyable, fostering a positive learning environment. Base on that, I think designing a math course thoughtfully is essential to engage students in meaningful learning and address their practical needs in daily life. It's important to structure the curriculum to not only impart mathematical knowledge but also to demonstrate its real-world relevance, helping students apply math skills to their everyday experiences and challenges.
***Revise***
Thank you for your response! I totally misunderstand the request. I will revise by tonight.
ReplyDeleteHi You, thank you your update on the post and sharing the point about the significant impact of a math teacher's proficiency and passion on students' learning experiences. It's unfortunate (and sadly very common) to hear that some students have had negative encounters with unskilled or dispassionate teachers, which can deter their interest in math. You also mention that designing a math course thoughtfully is crucial. Could you share any specific strategies or approaches you believe are effective in structuring a curriculum to emphasize real-world relevance and practical application of math skills? How do you think this approach can help students develop a deeper appreciation for mathematics and its usefulness in their daily lives?
ReplyDeleteOK -- I think something was missed in your reading of the article, You, but you show enough understanding through your post and the revision that I will take this as OK.
ReplyDelete